SCBC 1587
N 1176
Fourth coinage, Series F, i.m. coronet
O: facing crowned portrait of king, EDWARDVS REX ANGLI
R: Long cross, three pellets in each angle, CIVITAS LONDON
SNG France 2 Cilicie 1837
SNG Levante 1198 (plate 80)
RPC unassigned ID 60634 (12 specimens) [this coin illustrated in text cf. Bay Numismatics reference]
O: KOPNHLIAN CA-ΛΩNINAN CE, bust of empress r on a crescent, surrounded by oak wreath
R: TAPCOV M-HTPOΠOΛC ΩC in left field AMK and right field Γ Γ
from RPC online:
| Ταρσοῦ μητροπόλεως αʹ μ(εγίστης) κ(αλλίστης) γʹ γʹ | |
| Translation | of Tarsus, metropolis, the first, the greatest, the most beautiful, (of) 3 (eparchies), thrice (neocorate) |
Ex: W. Esty
Ex: N & N London Online Auction 50 (29.06. 2024) lot 362
Ex: Bay Numismatics (Rotterdam, NL) EA 2, (11 April 2024) lot 285
RIC X 100 variety
Esty Type 47
O: facing bust helmeted cuir with shield and spear lg cross on shield DN THEODOSIVS PF AVG
R: Constantinopolis std holding victory facing left with rt foot on prow CONCORDI-A AVGG/in ex ANTI
Ex: W. Esty
RIC VI Alexandria 21a
RCV 14073
O: FL VAL CONSTANTIVS NOB CAES, laur bust r
R: Genius standing l, eagle at feet to the left A in the right field, GENIO POPV-L-I ROMANI in ex ALE
Ex: W. Esty
Ex: Demeter Coins 6 (14 April 2024) lot 704
RCV 20895
RIC 87b
RCV 13419
O: laur draped bust r, DN MAXIMIANO FELISSIM
R: Providentia and
Quies stg facing each other holding branch, A in lower field between,
PROVIDENTIA DEORVM in ex ALE
Ex: W. Esty
KM 589
MT 479
O: Armored portrait of Leopold V. of Habsburg, value below,
date in front of the bust. LEOPOLDVS D G ARC D AVSTRI (10) in right field
1632
R: Crowned coat-of-arms with Hungary, Bohemia, Austria and
Tyrol, at bottom ancient Austria, surrounded by the chain of the Order of the
Golden Fleece. DVX BVRGVND COMES TYROL
RCV 21048
O: diad drap bust r [DN]HONOR[IVS PF AVG]
R: Victory adv l holding wreath and palm, P in field [VICTORIA AVGG] in ex [RM].
ex: W. Esty
purchased this example as a singleton at a shop at the Vatican. No Vatican Euro coins were available in change despite having read that 50 Euro cent examples could be had in change from some shops, we could not find examples of this during a short visit.
Main entrance as it appeared on 3 October 2024 just before some torrential rains dropped perhaps 2 cm of rain on Roma over the next few hours.
AE Centenionalis, 22 mm, 5.1 g, 6h, Roma mint c. CE 350-351
RIC VIII 219
O: bare headed and cuir bust r. Γ behind head. MAG DECENTI-VS
NOB CAES
R: VICT DD NN AVG ET CAES two victories supporting wreath inscribed
VOT/V/MVLT/X in ex. RS
Ex: Warren Esty
Ex: London Ancient Coins (UK) Auction E (08.08.2013) lot 277
SC 2443 (likely)
O: Diademed hd of Antiochus XI r, bearded, diadem ends falling straight behind,
dotted border.
R: BAΣΙΛΕΩΣ ANTIOXOV in two lines on r., EΠΙΦΑΝΟVΣ ΦΙΛΑΔΕΛΦOV in two lines on
l., Athena stg. l. holding Nike outside inscription and resting hand on
grounded shield, spear propped in crook of elbow.
Control: outer l. above bunch of grapes.
RPC 4144
Newell 41
Prieur 21
McAlee 22
O: diad hd
of Philip Philadelphus r.
R: Zeus
enthroned l holding Nike, frozen control under throne, AYT monogram inner left
field and HK in ex as the Caesarean Era year.
ΒΑΣΙΛΕΩΣ ΦΙΛΙΠΠΟΥ on right ΕΠΙΦΑΝΟΥΣ ΦΙΛΑΔΕΛΦΟΥ on left
EX: “Livia” Hoard 1998 cf. Richard G. McAlee “The Livia
Hoard of Pseudo-Philip Tetradrachms” AJN 11 (1999) pp. 1-12 and plates 1-3. Where
among the hoard of 677 pieces, only 20 were identified as Yr. 28.
EX: CNG which made
the coins available to McAlee for study.
RSC 612
RIC IV 168a
O: laur bust r SEVERVS AVG-PART MAX
R: Severus
stg l in military garb, offering sacrifice over altar RESTITVTO-RI VRBIS
This denarius
commemorates the restorative work in Roma undertaken by Severus after securing
his position in the wake of the civil wars arising after the murder of Commodus
in CE 192. One example, is some
restorative work commemorated by a now barely visible inscription on the
Pantheon beneath that of the Agrippa inscription, noting his contribution to
restoring the structure that “deteriorated by old age”.
SC 1910d
CSE II 513
O: diad hd right, fillet border.
R:
BAΣIΛEΩ[Σ]/ΔHMHTPIOY in two lines on right.
ΘEOY/ΦIΛAΔEΛΦOY/NIKATOPOΣ in three lines on the left. Apollo stg facing left
control marks in lower center left adjacent to Apollo's right leg.
RIC 110c type
O: M COMM ANT P FEL AVG BRIT, laur bust r.
R: FID EXERC in ex, PM TRP XI IMP VII COS IIII PP, Commodus haranguing troops
According to a posting on COINTALK the following was found about this coin type, or the background information pertaining to it:
There had been an attempted coup in 185. The praetorian prefect Perennis, commander of the praetorian cohorts since 180, plotted the assassination of Commodus, but he was betrayed by some of his men who secretly went to the palace and exposed the whole thing to the emperor. In imperial Rome, it was extremely difficult for civilians to meet the emperor in person, but the military had an easy access to him. This is what Herodian later wrote : " For not much later, some soldiers visited Perennis' son in secret and carried off coins bearing the prefect's portrait. And, without the knowledge of Perennis, the praetorian prefect, they took the coins directly to Commodus and revealed to him the secret details of the plot. They were richly rewarded for their service. While Perennis was still ignorant of these developments and anticipated nothing of the sort, the emperor sent for him at night and had him beheaded." Commodus soon went to the praetorian camp in order to secure the soldiers' loyalty. New coins representing this imperial visit to the praetorian camp were minted, first in gold and silver, later in bronze, with the legend Fides exercitus, "loyalty of the army". Herodian is the only author mentioning the coins with Perennis' portrait. Is it true, or is it a mere legend? If such coins were actually minted, they must have been aurei and denarii (like Pescennius Niger's 193 coinage in Antioch), and all destroyed soon afterwards...But it's more probably a legend, for Cassius Dio, who considered Perennis an able commander slain by his own mutinous soldiers, does not mention these coins. (Cited from: https://www.cointalk.com/threads/commodus-and-the-praetorians-a-sestertius.412928/)
Another site adds a little greater detail to what was discussed above:
Comment: Fides was the Roman personification of trust, loyalty and oath. She was also venerated under the name Fides Publica Populi Romani (roughly „general trustworthiness of the Roman people“). According to tradition, Rome’s second king Numa Pompilius established annual festivals in honour of Fides, and instituted that the higher priests (the three flamines maiores) were brought to the temple in a covered vaulted chariot drawn by two horses. There they were to conduct Fides‘ services with their heads covered and their right hands wrapped up to their fingers, thus showing absolute devotion to Fides and symbolising trust. There is historical evidence of the erection of a temple on the Capitol during the 1st Punic War. Its temple in Rome, consecrated in 254 BC by the consul Aulus Atilius Caiatinus, was located on the Capitol near the temple of Jupiter. Here the Roman Senate signed and kept treaties with other states, entrusting them to Fides‘ protection. As a rule, a standing woman is depicted, usually with ears of corn and a basket of fruit or a cornucopia and bowl. She thus embodies the „Fides publica“ – the promise of trust and loyalty between the emperor and the Roman people. In the later – and increasingly uncertain – imperial period, more and more issues of the „Fides militum“ and the „Fides exercitus“ were added, mostly with military attributes such as spear, sceptre, standard or aquila. These coins fervently invoke the loyalty of the legions and soldiers to their emperor. This “Fides Exercitus” denarius type can be dated to the year 186 AD. Although the eleventh Tribunicia Potestate of Commodus already began on 10 December 185 AD, he did not take up the fifth consulate until 01 January 186 AD – and therefore marks the earliest possible issue of this denarius. On the reverse legend we still see the seventh imperatorial title (IMP VII) from 184 AD – thus the coming eighth imperatorial title (IMP VIII, bellum desertorum under the leadership of Pescennius Niger), which he receives in the course of 186 AD, marks the end of the issue. The minting period can therefore be set between January and the middle / end of the year 186 AD.
In 184 AD barbarians crossed the border wall in Britain and cut down a Roman detachment (Dio LXXII 8. Comm. 6, 2. 8, 4. 13, 5. Dessau 1327). Commodus sent Ulpius Marcellus against them, who had already administered Britain in the time of Emperor Marcus (CIL VII 504). The latter succeeded in defeating the Britannians, but nevertheless there seems to have been a revolt among the three legions on the spot towards the end of 184 AD. Commodus’ favorite Perennis is said to have made himself unpopular with the Britannian legions by appointing knight army commanders instead of senatorial ones (Comm. 6, 2). The disaffected troops even wanted to elect a counter-emperor (Comm. 8, 4), perhaps a Priscus (Dio vol. V p. 208 Dind.). In any case, the insurgents sent a large deputation of 1500 men to Rome to effect the overthrow of Perennis (Dio LXXII 9, 2-4). Apparently, the deputation – unhindered by anyone – got as far as just outside Rome, where Commodus is said to have met them. When asked about their motives, the mutinous soldiers are said to have replied to Commodus “they were here because Perennis had plotted against him and was planning to make his son emperor”. Commodus believed them, especially since another of Commodus’ minions – Cleander – further encouraged him in this belief. Thereupon Commodus, fearing the deputation of the Britannic army, abandoned his all-powerful prefect to the soldiers, who killed him with his wife, sister and two sons (Dio LXXII 9, 4. 13, 1. Comm. 6, 2). The fact that Commodus not only abandoned Perennis to the mob, but also the family of his prefect, and that he subsequently appointed two “Praefecti praetorio” instead of a single one as before, shows that Commodus certainly believed in a real conspiracy. To these historical events of the years 184 and 185 AD appear on aurei and denarii (RIC 110) for the first time on the backs of the coins an emperor standing on a pedestal in front of three soldiers, each holding a legionary eagle. The three soldiers probably symbolize the three mutinous legions stationed in Britain.
With this, however, the troubled times do not seem to have come to an end. Remarkable is the number of “Fides Exercitus” issues on medallions, sestertii and denarii (RIC 130, 468) in different variations, which were continued in the following year 186 AD – among them the siberdenary presented here. All of them show the emperor Commodus in military dress; alone on a pedestal; in front of him are either three, four, five or six soldiers with three legionary eagles. Since here again explicitly three legion eagles are depicted, a reference to the three Britannic legions suggests itself again. Since there had also been similar aurei issues, one could possibly also assume possible donatives. However, the minting of sestertii speaks against it. Judging by the poor quality of individual dies, the coins were produced in a certain hurry, which in any case suggests an acute need for a large amount of currency. The mutinous legions in Britain were still not pacified after the fall of Perennis, and the mutiny continued. Commodus had recalled Pertinax (later emperor) from exile after the prefect’s fall and entrusted him with supreme command of the three Britannian legions. When Pertinax arrived on the island the unrest reached another peak. The soldiers were still without the desired new emperor and to this end proclaimed Pertinax as the new emperor. The latter refused and finally put down the uprisings of the legions – nevertheless the unrest among the soldiers had almost cost Pertinax his life. But also in Germania superior there were riots among mutinous soldiers in 186 AD, led by a certain Maternus. Maternus and his band of robbers roamed Gaul and Spain, raiding and plundering major cities. In addition to the unrest, there were attacks by Germanic groups who crossed the Rhine. An inscription from Urbinium speaks of a “nova obsidio” from which the Legio VIII Augusta under the command of the tribune C. Vesvius Vindex was able to free itself. The wax tablet in Rottweil is dated 14 August 186 AD and mentions the liberation of Legio VIII.
Fides Exercitus, if not Fides Exercituum, may be understood here as an appeal to the mutinous Britannic legions. The three legionary eagles can be seen on almost all depictions of this. However, a reference to the events in Upper Germania would also be conceivable. Primary source: „Maria Regina Kaiser-Raiß; Die stadtrömische Münzprägung während der Alleinherrschaft des Commodus“.
URL for citation above is Yothr CRI.186.5a - Yothr Commodus Coin Collection
.jpg)
SB 366
O: DN IVSTINVS PP AV or similar, Justin l
and Sophia r std facing on double throne both nimbate.
R: Large K, above Θ+c, A/N/N/O to left and X for regnal year
to right with Tεs
in ex.
AE Half Follis, 20 mm, 6.52 g, Thessalonica
mint RY 10/CE 574-575
SB 366
O: DN IVSTINVS PP AV or similar, Justin l
and Sophia r std facing on double throne both nimbate.
R: Large K, above Θ+c, A/N/N/O to left and X for regnal year
to right with Tεs
in ex.
AE Follis, 23 x 27
mm, 7.03 g, Thessalonica mint RY 14/CE 623-624
SB 825
O: no legend
Heraclius Constantine, Heraclius and Martina stg facing (it appears that HC is
on the left and Martina on the right).
R: Large M, A/N/N/O
on left X/II/II on right and officina is unreadable but likely B, with Θεc in ex.
AE Half Tetarteron, 16 mm, 1.79 g, Thessalonica mint
SB 1954
O: fig stg facing on footstool wearing nimbus cr pallium and
colobium holding book in l, insc to left and right reads IC/XC
R: Emperor bust facing but holding labarum, insc reads + Iω ΔεcπOT or similar
AE Decanummium, 18 mm, 2.46 g, Constantinople mint
SB 645
O: crowned cuir bust facing holding gl cr and shield. O N
FOCAS PERP AVG or similar
R: Large X with cross above.
AE Follis; 24 x 19 mm, 5.21 g, 6h, Constantinople mint.
SB 1607
O: facing portraits of Nicephoros l and Stauracius r with + in between
R: Large M with A below and + above with XXX on left and NNN on right.
Nicephoros was killed at the Battled of Pliska in CE 811 by troops of the Bulgar Khan, Krum (d. CE 814). Krum took Nicephoros' skull, had it plated in silver and made into a drinking vessel. Which John Julius Norwich indicates was used for the remainder of Krum's life as his drinking cup. (p. 124 "A Short History of Byzantium" NY 1997).
Stauracius is remembered for having the shortest reign of approximately 68 days as Byzantine emperor before abdicating and succumbing to his wounds received in the battle which was a severed spine and paralysis from a neck wound.
AE 18 mm,
2.58 g, 5h, Antioch mint c. CE 379-383
RCV 20137
O: diad
draped cuirassed bust r, DN GRATIA-NVS PF AVG
R: Roma std
facing left VIRTVS RO-[MA]NORVM in ex. ANTΔ and in left field Θ and in right field Φ
Ex: W. Esty
CCS Antioch 10a
Metcalf 102-103
O: facing bust of St Peter
R: square cross with Bohemund's name divided up in quadrants
BA IM
ɣN ΔOC
Ex: W. Esty
S/S 81.3
Album 1880.2
O: Roman style bust left with spear and shield
ضرب بسنجار سنة تسع و تسعين و خمسماءة
R: inscription without overlord
الامام الناصر لدين الله الملك المنصور قطب الدنيا و الدين محمد بن زنكي بن مودود
EX: CNG 38 (6-7 June 1996) lot 1372 (part II Spengler/Sayles
Ref. Collection; Zengids)
EX: William F. Spengler & Wayne G. Sayles Reference
Collection of Turkoman Figurative Bronze Coins.
SC 2040
O: diad. Hd of Tryphon r. no dotted border off center
R: ΒΑΣΙΛΕΩΣ TPYΦΩNOΣ in two lines on r., [A]YTOKPATOPOΣ on
l., spiked Macedonian helmet with cheek guards facing l., adorned with Ibex
horn above visor.
Controls: AΣK
SC 2221.1d variety, controls on center left in the published
example.
O: diad hd of Alexander II r., diadem ends falling straight
behind, dotted border.
R: ΒΑΣΙΛΕΩΣ on r., ΑΛΕΞΑΝΔPOY
on l., filleted double cornucopiae oriented to the r.
Primary control
monogram of AX inner left and secondary control inner right AI
Cf. example sold by
Numismatik Naumann Auction 109 (17.10.2021) lot 69 from different obs and rev
dies.
Album 1892.3 (R)
AE Dirham?, 20-22.6 mm, 4.51g, Erzincan mint AH 579/CE 1183-84
O: Profile hd in hexagon, Arabic inscription around “struck
in Erzincan year 579”
R: in square “Malik
al-Umara/Shah ghazi/Bahram shah” and around “Nasir Amir al-Mu’minin/Ibn Da’ud”
Ex: W. Esty
RIC 106
RCV 19152
O: diad
draped bust r DN FL CL IVLI-ANVS PF AVG
R: bull
standing r with two stars above, SECVRITAS REIPVB in ex, *BSIRM (wreath)
SC 2370 (R2)
O: diad hd of Antiochos r dotted border
R: ΒAΣIΛEΩΣ ANTIOXOY in two lines on r, ΦΙΛΟΠATOPOΣ on
l. control mark, E/A/Π vertically to left.
Tyche stg l.
AE 19.5 mm, 7.35 g, Antioch mint.
SC 2425.1
HGC 9, 1284 (R2)
O: diad, beardless bust r, dotted
border
R: BAΣΙΛΕΩΣ ΣΕΛΕVKOV in two lines on the rt, EΠΙΦNOVΣ
NIKATOPOΣ in two lines on the l, Apollo stg l, testing arrow and resting elbow
on column. Primary controls on outer left
SICA II, 643
O: بسم الله ضرب
هذا الدرهم بدمشق سنة ماة
